Legal Opinion

Genta v. Ross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an. action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries, originally instituted against W. A. Ross. Upon his death it was revived and Michael Ross, an administrator of his estate, was substituted as party defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $3500. After unavailing motions for a new trial andl arrest of judgment, defendant duly appealed.

Plaintiff’s petition charges negligence, as follows: (1) Failure to'furnish a reasonably safe place in which to work, in that a large rock was permitted to be and remain for a long time in a loose…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Young v. Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Dakan v. G. W. Chase, & Son Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Smith v. Ohio Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Littig v. Urbauer-Atwood Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API