Legal Opinion

Gold Standard, Inc. v. American Barrick Resources Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1990No. 890393PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Gold Standard, Inc., brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel production of a document which the trial judge found to be privileged. We reverse.

In December 1986, Gold Standard filed the lawsuit from which this appeal arises against several entities, including appel-lees. One of Gold Standard’s claims in the suit is that appellees, who were all involved in the sale of property known as the Mer-cur Mine, structured the sale in derogation of Gold Standard’s interests in the mine. On May 10, 1989, Gold Standard filed a motion to compel…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
  4. In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Automated Geographic Reference CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Munson v. ChamberlainUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Doe v. MaretUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Madsen v. United Television, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. SER Montpelier US Insurance Co. v. Hon. Louis H. Bloom, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API