Gold Standard, Inc. v. American Barrick Resources Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Gold Standard, Inc., brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel production of a document which the trial judge found to be privileged. We reverse.
In December 1986, Gold Standard filed the lawsuit from which this appeal arises against several entities, including appel-lees. One of Gold Standard’s claims in the suit is that appellees, who were all involved in the sale of property known as the Mer-cur Mine, structured the sale in derogation of Gold Standard’s interests in the mine. On May 10, 1989, Gold Standard filed a motion to compel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- In the Matter of Carl Walsh, a Witness Before the Special September 1978 Grand Jury. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Automated Geographic Reference CenterUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Munson v. ChamberlainUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Doe v. MaretUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Madsen v. United Television, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- SER Montpelier US Insurance Co. v. Hon. Louis H. Bloom, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.