Legal Opinion

In Re Graham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1962No. Calendar 49,562PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

June 5, 1959, this Court adopted its currently effective rules for superintendence of the judiciary of Michigan. Such rules were prepared and submitted to the Chief Justice, with due recommendation of adoption, by the board of commissioners of the integrated Michigan bar. A transcript thereof may be found in 356 Mich xv-xxi. They were designed as implements of procedure and due process for the constitutional mandate of superintendence. See Const 1908, art 7, § 4.

Following an investigation which had been instituted and concluded by the attorney general, and reference by his office of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. In the Matter of ProbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. In Re MussmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Ransford v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API