People v. Hamilton
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Joseph Roy Hamilton and Alfred Bundy were convicted of burglary and their appeal from the judgments and from the orders denying a new trial presents, as one of the questions for decision, the admissibility of a record of conviction for the purpose of impeachment. Other grounds for reversal relied upon have to do with the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, an asserted lack of corroboration of the testimony of an accomplice, and the court’s failure to give certain instructions as to an accomplice’s testimony.
The appellants were jointly charged with the commission of three…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. KoenigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. McGeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. GuiuanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.