Legal Opinion
M.H. v. Garcia
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 31, 2012No. WD 74440PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judge.
John Garcia appeals the entry of a full order of protection against him and in favor of his former live-in girlfriend, M.H.1 But because his brief fails to substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 84.04, we dismiss his appeal.
Analysis
Garcia appears before us pro se. “Although we are mindful of the difficulties that a party appearing pro se encounters in complying with the rules of procedure, we must require pro se appellants to comply with these rules.” Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., 211 S.W.3d 145, 146 (Mo.App. W.D.2007). Pro se appellants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Shumpert v. ShumpertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lanham v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Biersmith v. Curry Ass'n Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Leonard v. FrisbieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kimble v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Snellen ex rel. Snellen v. Capital Region Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Office of Public Counsel v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Anthony Jay Shelton vs. Crystelle Marie SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025