Legal Opinion
Glanville v. DUPAR, INC.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 20, 2010No. Civil Action H-08-2537PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs filed this suit on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated current and former workers of Dupar, Inc., Dupar Properties, Inc., and J. Kelly Parsons (collectively “Dupar”), alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), violations of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (“FICA”) and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (“FUTA”), breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation. Dupar moved under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss for failure to state a claim.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Archer and White Sales, Inc. v. Henry Schein, IncoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Marren v. StoutDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- New York and Presbyterian Hospital v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Minichino v. La RosaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Poff v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.