Legal Opinion

Minichino v. La Rosa

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 1, 2024No. 3:24-cv-04048Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIE MINICHINO, Case No. 24-cv-04048-LJC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 9 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 10 LEO LA ROSA, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION AND IFP APPLICATION Plaintiff Marie Minichino, pro se, brings employment claims against Defendants Leo La 14 Rosa, Marshall Meyer, Nick Cohen Meyer, Ruth Lesser, “Mrs. Naimoon,” and Kitt Shoh. 15 Sufficient cause having been shown, Minichino’s Application to Proceed in Forma…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API