Industrial Commission v. C & D Pipeline, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Presiding Judge.
This appeal and cross appeal raise the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 34-324(A) of the Arizona Public Works Act, A.R.S. § 34-321, et seq., better known as the “Little Davis-Bacon Act.” The questioned statute charges the Industrial Commission with the responsibility of setting a general prevailing rate of per diem wages which contractors on state public works projects must pay their employees.
The appellants and cross-appellees, the Industrial Commission of Arizona, Harry G. Kelley and O. E. Eagleton (Commission) have challenged; (1) the jurisdiction of the superior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Schryver v. SchirmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- State Tax Commission v. Quebedeaux ChevroletArizona Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- West Ottawa Public Schools v. Director, Department of LaborMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Gutierrez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Hunter v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.