Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. C & D Pipeline, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 1979No. 1 CA-CIV 3727PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Presiding Judge.

This appeal and cross appeal raise the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 34-324(A) of the Arizona Public Works Act, A.R.S. § 34-321, et seq., better known as the “Little Davis-Bacon Act.” The questioned statute charges the Industrial Commission with the responsibility of setting a general prevailing rate of per diem wages which contractors on state public works projects must pay their employees.

The appellants and cross-appellees, the Industrial Commission of Arizona, Harry G. Kelley and O. E. Eagleton (Commission) have challenged; (1) the jurisdiction of the superior…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Schryver v. SchirmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State Tax Commission v. Quebedeaux ChevroletArizona Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. West Ottawa Public Schools v. Director, Department of LaborMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Gutierrez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hunter v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API