Torres v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORMAN LEE, Justice
(Assigned).
Appellant Fernando Guillermo Torres (Torres) appeals his conviction for assault, claiming the jury should have been charged about apparent danger. We agree that the trial court should have instructed the jury about apparent danger. Additionally, we overrule the State’s cross-point that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on self-defense. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND
A jury found Torres guilty of assault because of a physical altercation he had with his then wife. At trial, both parties described the altercation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Giesberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- East v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002
- Hubbard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- Alonso Ordonez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.