Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Target Products
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1991No. 56A03-9009-CV-398PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRARD, Judge.
Charles Murphy (Murphy) filed a two count complaint on March 23, 1989. In count one he sought to recover from Federal Mogul Corporation and Target Products Division as manufacturers or sellers of a defective power saw, under products liability law, alleging defective manufacture or design. (In count two he alleged that C.4. Stephan, Inc. was strictly liable for selling or repairing a defective product. Murphy also requested jury trial.
Defendants answered, asserted affirmative defenses, and requested a jury trial.
(On October 18, 1989 Murphy moved for leave to add as a defendant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hazen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Bondu v. GurvichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Boyd v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Trevino v. OrtegaTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Hirsch v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Coleman v. Eddy Potash, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.