Legal Opinion

Bow v. Nakamura

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1986No. 10624PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

Plaintiff Rodney Siu Hung Bow (Plaintiff) appeals the trial court’s judgment that Defendants Robert Shigeru Nakamura and Gayle Chang Nakamura (collectively Nakamuras), and Dianne Lynn Yee Lee (Lee) (hereafter Nakamuras and Lee are collectively referred to as Defendants) 1 are not liable for consequential damages for the expenses incurred by Plaintiff under his agreement of sale. We affirm.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On May 31, 1977, Plaintiff entered into an agreement of sale (A/S) to purchase a condominium apartment from Cooke-Amfac Joint Ventures (Cooke-Amfac). Under a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosa v. JohnstonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Francone v. McClayHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Title Guaranty Escrow Services, Inc. v. PowleyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Senior Estates, Inc. v. Bauman Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Borton v. Medicine Rock Land CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Yates v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompaniesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API