Legal Opinion

Lowenschuss v. Kane

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 27, 1975No. Nos. 497, 498, Dockets 74-2156, 74-2216PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

The central issue on this appeal is whether a stockholder who has tendered his shares in response to a tender offer may recover damages from the offeror for failure to consummate the transaction where the failure is attributable to the intervening issuance by the court of a preliminary injunction barring the proposed acquisition. We must also decide whether genuine issues of material fact were presented which precluded summary judgment dismissing the shareholders’ complaint.

Plaintiff Fred Lowenschuss is a shareholder of Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. (“A & P”)…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,060 the Connecticut National Bank v. Fluor Corporation and Fluor Acquisition CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Gilbert v. El Paso Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1984
  3. Project Release v. PrevostCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Abramo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Rolf v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API