Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Commissioner of Economic Security

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 2001No. C7-01-186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge

Relator was denied unemployment-compensation benefits based on the determination of the commissioner’s representative that, because of a limitation on the hours she could work, she was not “available for employment” as required by Minn.Stat. § 268.085 (2000). Because the evidence reasonably supports the commissioner’s representative’s determination that relator was not eligible for benefits, we affirm.

FACTS

In 1990, relator Donna M. Mueller began working as a receptionist with Group Health, Inc. Apparently in late 1997 or early 1998, Mueller underwent surgery for neck and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. PloetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Weaver v. Minnesota Valley Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Decker v. City Pages, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. Carlson v. DEPT. OF EMPLOY. & ECON. DEV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Carlson v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API