Mueller v. Commissioner of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge
Relator was denied unemployment-compensation benefits based on the determination of the commissioner’s representative that, because of a limitation on the hours she could work, she was not “available for employment” as required by Minn.Stat. § 268.085 (2000). Because the evidence reasonably supports the commissioner’s representative’s determination that relator was not eligible for benefits, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1990, relator Donna M. Mueller began working as a receptionist with Group Health, Inc. Apparently in late 1997 or early 1998, Mueller underwent surgery for neck and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. PloetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Weaver v. Minnesota Valley Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Decker v. City Pages, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlson v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Carlson v. DEPT. OF EMPLOY. & ECON. DEV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Carlson v. Department of Employment & Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008