Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carlson v. Department of Employment & Economic Development

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 2008No. A07-28Published

1DissentKlaphake, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Although I agree that relator is ineligible for unemployment benefits during the time he was physically incarcerated in the Hennepin County Corrections Facility, from April 28, 2006, through June 26, 2006, this period of ineligibility should have ended upon his release to his home with an electronic monitoring device.

MinmStat. § 268.085, subd. 2(3) (2006), states that an applicant is ineligible for unemployment benefits while incarcerated or performing court-ordered community service. I agree with the majority that this statute is ambiguous as applied here. The statute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. American Indian Chemical Dependency Diversion ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Mueller v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API