Legal Opinion
Pure Oil Co. v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., Inc. (Two Cases)
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 22, 1954No. 11867, 11868PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
These are appeals from judgments rendered by the District Court in two cases brought under Rev.Stat. § 4915 1 against the Pure Oil Company, which had been awarded a patent by the Patent Office for an invention in the treatment of hydrocarbon oils, after interference proceedings there. Plaintiff in one case was the Shell Development Company. Plaintiff in the other was the Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. As both cases involved the same claimed invention, they were consolidated for trial. After a hearing, the District Court adjudged that Socony was entitled to a patent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Smith v. Carter Carburetor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Shell Development Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Span-Deck, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Fab-Con, Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation and Rauenhorst Corporation, Aminnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- General Motors Corporation v. R. E. Dietz CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.