Legal Opinion
Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. Clow
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MONTGOMERY, PJ.
An appeal was perfected to this court by the appellant, Kent S. Clow, from the final entry on exceptions and decree confirming the appraisal record entered by the Conservancy Court. Prom the same order similar appeals were perfected to this court in 123 additional cases, to-wit: Numbers 476 to 547, inclusive, numbers 555 to 561, inclusive, number 570, numbers 574 to 587, inclusive, numbers 596 to 623, inclusive, and number 625. The order, entered in this case in conformity with this opinion may be entered in each and all of the above numbered cases. The discussion…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist v. HaynesOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Tarkio-Squaw Levee District of Holt County v. CrouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Hostetter v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
- In Matter of the Exception v. Carlisle, 06ap120067 (4-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District v. Carlisle Tree Farms, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Muskingum Watershed Dist. v. Blackwell, 2007 Ap 09 0057 (12-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008