Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist v. Haynes
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MONTGOMERY, J.
The appellants in these twenty-seven several actions are property owners entitled to compensation or damages, or both, as the result of their real estate being affected injuriously by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District project. The basis of the complaints of appellants is that the conservancy court established an incorrect rule for the assessment of compensation and damages to them. The question is stated by appellants in the following language:
“In the appropriation cases which §6828-34 GC, now insures to appellants, and which the conservancy court has…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chesapeake & Hocking Ry Co. v. SnyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by1 opinion
- Muskingum Watershed Conservancy Dist. v. ClowOhio Court of Appeals · 1937