Legal Opinion
United States v. Ojeda Rios
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 30, 1990No. 89-61PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
This case arises under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Title III), as amended, 18 U. S. C. §2510 et seq., which regulates the interception of wire, oral, and electronic communications. Except under extraordinary circumstances, see §2518(7), electronic surveillance may be conducted only pursuant to a court order. See §§ 2518(1) — (6). Section 2518(8)(a) requires that “[t]he contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication intercepted by any means authorized by this chapter shall, if possible, be recorded on tape or wire or other comparable device”…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Pasquale Falcone Appeal of Pasquale Falconio in No. 73-2013. Appeal of Wally Berger in No. 73-2109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Kenneth CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Mario GiganteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. ScafidiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Lupe GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.