Legal Opinion
Cary v. . Home Insurance Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1923PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
The action, is on a policy of marine insurance on the good barge called “ Cary Brick Company No. 8.” It is a time policy. (1 Arnould on Marine Ins. [10th ed.] §.436) running .for .one year from the 23d of August, 1917, to the 23d of August, 1918. The barge was confined to the waters of New York harbor and adjacent waters. The policy in usual terms covered the adventures and perils of the harbor. It excepted from its terms among other things all damage that may be done to the vessel (a) from the want of ordinary care and skill in loading and stowing the cargo of said vessel, and (b) from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Berwind v. . Greenwich Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Leitch v. . Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Van Wickle v. Mechanics & Traders' InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Clinchfield Fuel Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Shamrock Towing Co. v. American Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Plymouth Rubber Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Mattson v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.