Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Geddes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 9, 1988No. WCB 83-11452, WCB 83-12221, WCB 83-12222, WCB 83-00025, WCB 85-21111, WCB 85-02112; CA A42025PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that found Wilson’s IGA responsible for claimant’s disability and awarded attorney fees to claimant. On de novo review, we agree with the Board that Wilson’s IGA is responsible, because claimant’s work there independently contributed to his disability.

Petitioners also challenge the award of attorney fees to claimant on the responsibility issue, contending that claimant is only a nominal party and not entitled to attorney fees for the hearing which was conducted under ORS 656.307. Although attorney fees are ordinarily not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petshow v. Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Anfora v. Liberty CommunicationsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Evans v. Rookard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Garrett FreightlinersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Howard v. Willamette PoultryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Mercer Industries v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API