Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Garrett Freightliners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1988No. WCB 83-06115, 83-06552; CA A42731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of the Board’s order which denied his request for insurer-paid attorney fees on the ground that his participation at the hearing was nominal only. Employer and its present insurer, Transport Insurance Company, cross-petition, asserting that the Board incorrectly affirmed the referee’s determination that Transport Insurance Company and not Farmers Insurance is responsible for claimant’s back condition. We affirm on the petition and on the cross-petition and write only to explain why there is no basis for insurer-paid attorney fees.

Althou…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petshow v. Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Anfora v. Liberty CommunicationsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Wilson v. GeddesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Multnomah County School District v. TignerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Howard v. Willamette PoultryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Mercer Industries v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API