Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Teagarden v. Igwe

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2024No. 2023-1565PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 591.] THE STATE EX REL . TEAGARDEN v. IGWE ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Teagarden v. Igwe,

2024-Ohio-5772.] Mandamus—Public-records requests—R.C. 149.43—Without submitting evidence that respondent created or maintained a requested record, relator has not proved by clear and convincing evidence that respondent violated Public Records Act by referring relator to where the requested documents were posted—A public-records request does not need to use particular language to invoke Public Records Act, but it must be clear…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Wachendorf v. ShaverOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clark v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2025
  2. State ex rel. Berry v. BoothOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State ex rel. Ware v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. State ex rel. Ayers v. SackettOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State ex rel. Howard v. Chief Inspector's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API