Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Berry v. Booth
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2024No. 2023-1163PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 544.] THE STATE EX REL . BERRY v. BOOTH ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Berry v. Booth,
2024-Ohio-5774.] Mandamus—Public-records requests—R.C. 149.43—Respondents’ delay in providing requested documents was not unreasonable—Writ and statutory damages denied. (No. 2023-1163—Submitted July 23, 2024—Decided December 10, 2024.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ The per curiam opinion below was joined by FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and DETERS, JJ. DEWINE, J., authored a concurring opinion, which DETERS, J., joined.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Nation-Wide Check Corporation, Inc. v. Forest Hills Distributors, Inc., Nation-Wide Check Corporation, Inc. v. Forest Hills Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Niz-Chavez v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- State Ex Rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Toledo-Lucas County Port AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Striker v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Teagarden v. IgweOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State ex rel. Ware v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- State ex rel. Clark v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2025
- State ex rel. Howard v. Chief Inspector's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2026
- State ex rel. Harris v. StarcherOhio Supreme Court · 2026