Legal Opinion

White v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1890No. 14,807PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

The appellee is the owner of a railroad running on and over Canal street in the city of Logansport. Said street is sixty feet wide, and the main track of said railroad, as originally built and ever since maintained, is located along the center of said street. Appellant is the owner of a lot abutting and fronting on the south side of said street, upon which is situated a dwelling-house in which she resides, and her only means of ingress and egress to and from said lot is from said street. After the construction of the main track of said railroad the defendant company, without any permission of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Common Council v. CroasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. City of Lafayette v. NagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Smiley v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  2. New Jersey, Indiana & Illinois Railroad v. TuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Porter v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Mordhurst v. Ft. Wayne & Southwestern Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1904

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API