Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. Sholy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1988No. Crim. 880064PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

David Sholy was convicted in municipal court, City of Bismarck, of violating a “dog at large” ordinance and he appealed his conviction to the county court. After having been found guilty in county court, Sholy appealed to this court. The only issue on appeal is whether the ordinance requires some level of culpability.

Bismarck City Ordinance 3-03-05 provides, in part:

“1. It is unlawful for any owner or keeper of a dog to permit the animal to be at large.”

The question, then, is whether the word “permit” as used in Bismarck City Ordinance 3-03-05 requires that some level of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clements v. LoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. HogieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. Fargo Bottling Works Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Olson v. BakkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. RambousekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fairmount Township Board of Supervisors Ex Rel. Fairmount Township Zoning Board v. BeardmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. PlentychiefNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. GrenzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API