Zuromski v. Lukaszek

This is an action in assumpsit for the breach of a noncompeting provision in a bill of sale of personal property. At the close of the evidence, the defendant made two motions. The first was for a direction of verdict in his favor; and the second, for a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff for nominal damages. The trial justice denied the former motion and granted the latter, on the ground that there was no evidence of actual damage. The case is before us on plaintiff’s exception to the second of these rulings, and on one other exception to a ruling on evidence during the trial.

By bill…