Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Walls

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County. Action by T. C. Bowling against D. B. Walls and others. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BobiNSON, Judge:

Bowling sold his store to Walls and agreed to stay out of the mercantile business for a period of four months. Part of the consideration for the sale was represented by notes. The agreement not to compete was a part of the transaction of sale but was contained in a separate writing of the same date as that of the notes. When Bowling sued on one of the notes, Walls claimed recoupment for breach of the agreement, and produced evidence at the trial tending to prove that within the four months Bowling went into the mercantile business in the name of his brother, as a competitor of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wood v. Pender-Doxey Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. Scotton v. WrightSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
  3. Ballengee v. WhitlockWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Armstrong v. Isbell (In Re Isbell)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Zuromski v. LukaszekSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API