Legal Opinion

State v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 23, 2010No. 519,2009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice.

The defendant-appellee, Randolph Clayton (“Clayton”), has been charged by indictment with Possession of a Firearm by a Person Prohibited 1 and is currently pending trial. The State’s theory of the case is that Clayton, who was prohibited from possessing a deadly weapon, was in constructive possession of one or more handguns.

Pursuant to article IV, section 11(8) of the Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 41, the Superior Court has certified, and this Court has accepted the following question of law:

Whether the phrase “intention to guide the gun’s destiny” is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claudio v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Lecates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Gallman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Landry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025
  4. State v. BarrettSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. State v. BarrettSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API