Legal Opinion

Claudio v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 22, 1991PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendants-appellants, Carmelo Claudio (“Claudio”) and Enrique Maymi (“Maymi”), appeal their convictions, following a joint trial before a jury, in the Superi- or Court. Both defendants were convicted, as charged, of Robbery in the First Degree, four counts of Possession of a Deadly Weapon During the Commission of a Felony, two counts of Conspiracy in the First Degree and one count each of Murder in the First Degree and Attempted Murder in the First Degree. These charges arose out of a series of events which transpired during the early morning hours of February 14, 1987.

Fo…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. People v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API