State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. A.H.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This case presents the issue whether the Alaska Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) is required to pay for paternity testing to determine the parentage of a child who has a legally presumed father.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
AH. and D.H., a married couple, separated and filed for dissolution of marriage. 1 At the February 1992 dissolution hearing, A.H. was pregnant with D.J., the father of whom she alleged to be J.Z. Because J.Z. did not acknowledge paternity, the court refused to grant the dissolution.
A.H. sought the assistance of CSED to establish…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Pursley v. HischIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- State v. ColitonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alaska General Alarm, Inc. v. GrinnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Bodwell v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division v. WethereltAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Rubright v. ArnoldAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Rubright v. ArnoldAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.