Legal Opinion
Maziasz v. Anderson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1970No. 37PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The obligation of an insurance company is imposed either by the terms of the contract entered into with its named insured or by the provisions of statutory law which are imported into the contract by legislative enactment. Stone v. Inter-State Exchange (1930), 200 Wis. 585, 229 N. W. 26; Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1932), 207 Wis. 445, 240 N. W. 881.
It appears clear that no express coverage is afforded by the policy. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company’s policy insuring the hazards of the Bruce Municipal Equipment Company is limited to its obligation:
“To pay on behalf of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Culver v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Mauel v. Wisconsin Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Calumet Auto Co. v. DinyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Stone v. Inter-State ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Terry v. Mongin Insurance AgencyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Schoenecker v. HainesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Terry v. Mongin Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Decade's Monthly Income & Appreciation Fund v. HirschboeckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Dairyland Insurance Company v. KluckmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.