Legal Opinion
Schoenecker v. Haines
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1979No. 76-603PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The only question presented on appeal is which of two automobile liability insurers is liable for $654 damages incurred as the result of an automobile accident.
Darlene E. Haines insured her personal automobile with the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. On April 21,1972, her own car was being repaired by Bauer-Zorn, Inc., a corporation engaged in selling, repairing, and servicing of motor vehicles. Haines was given a loaner to use while her car was in the custody of Bauer-Zorn for repairs. She was driving the loaner when the accident occurred.
Bauer-Zorn had a garage liability…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Faltersack v. Vanden BoogaardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Reetz v. WerchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Roeske v. DiefenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Maziasz v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by22 opinions
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Allwein v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Noland v. Virginia Insurance ReciprocalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Jones v. Medox, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.