Legal Opinion

Hicks v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1981No. 80-714PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

Having denied a Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence, the court in a non-jury trial found appellant, Millard A. Hicks, guilty of possession of heroin. See D.C. Code 1973, §§ 33-401(n), -402(a). The only question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding probable cause for appellant’s arrest and search, without permitting defense counsel to cross-examine a police detective to the point of revealing the concealed location from which he had observed the transactions in drugs. We hold that (1) the government has a qualified privilege to withhold the location of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary Barrett GreenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. LugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API