Hicks v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Having denied a Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence, the court in a non-jury trial found appellant, Millard A. Hicks, guilty of possession of heroin. See D.C. Code 1973, §§ 33-401(n), -402(a). The only question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding probable cause for appellant’s arrest and search, without permitting defense counsel to cross-examine a police detective to the point of revealing the concealed location from which he had observed the transactions in drugs. We hold that (1) the government has a qualified privilege to withhold the location of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Gary Barrett GreenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Commonwealth v. LugoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.