Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1992No. 90-CF-318PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

The government has a qualified privilege not to reveal the exact location of a concealed surveillance post used by police officers in their continuing battle against drug traffic. In this case, as in the past, the government refused to reveal the location of one such observation post. Appellant challenges the trial court’s refusal to compel its disclosure. Since we find no error in the trial court’s decision, and since we see no merit in appellant’s other arguments, we affirm his conviction of distribution of heroin.

I

One afternoon in August 1989, Officer Ralph Nitz of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API