Haywood v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This is a Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, case in which the plaintiff, Playwood, a seaman, failed to convince a jury that the defendant corporation, his employer and the operator of a vessel on which he was working, was responsible for his sustaining an injurious fall. The principal questions which Haywood raises on this appeal are whether the District Court committed reversible error in excluding certain evidence and whether there was any substantial evidence to justify the court’s action in submitting the issue of contributory negligence to the jury.
The accident happened…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joe Freitas v. Pacific-Atlantic Steamship Company, a Corporation, and Marine Terminals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Dickerson v. American Sugar Refining Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Gladstone v. Matson Navigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954