Legal Opinion

Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Bynum

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1903PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from tlie City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the Hon Charles A. Senn. This action was brought by the appellee, John Bynum, against the Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Company, to recover ten thousand dollars damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while a passenger on one of the defendant’s street cars, by reason of the negligence of the defendant; the negligence complained of being the defective condition of the coupling apparatus by which…

Read the full summary

Appeal from tlie City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the Hon Charles A. Senn. This action was brought by the appellee, John Bynum, against the Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Company, to recover ten thousand dollars damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained by him while a passenger on one of the defendant’s street cars, by reason of the negligence of the defendant; the negligence complained of being the defective condition of the coupling apparatus by which two of the cars of the defendant were coupled together, upon one of which cars the defendant urns riding at the time he…

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

Will Patty, a witness for the jilain-tiff, testified that he had run on the defendant’s road as a. conductor and motonnan for over three years, up to February, 1901, and that the company were still using the same kind of cars they did when he was on the road. The evidence tended to show that, the accident by which the plaintiff was injured, occurred from tyro cars becoming uncoupled. The witness had stated fully the coupling apparatus of the cars; the bars used for the purpose, where they were attached to the cars and how; the kind of pin used for the purpose; the draw heads of the cars, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. MalletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Holland v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Frazer v. South & North Ala. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Conway v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Salter v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Shafer v. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API