Legal Opinion
Gladstone v. Matson Navigation Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1954No. Civ. 15877PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment for $8,000 in favor of plaintiff.
Questions Presented
1. Sufficiency of the evidence.
2. Correctness of instructions.
Record
Plaintiff was employed as a stewardess on board defendant’s S.S. Lurline, and was injured while performing her duty as such stewardess. Of the three ■ causes of action in the first amended complaint, the first is for negligence under the Jones Act (41 Stats. 1007, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688) for injuries. The second is for maintenance. The third is for injuries due to the unseaworthiness of the ship under the general maritime law. Motions for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Cookingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Read v. United States. United States Maritime Commission v. Williams Appeal of VassilopoulusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Intagliata v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. MakaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Blodow v. Pan Pacific Fisheries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lanciotti v. Matson Navigation Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1955