Rivers v. Amato
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] Donald and Mary Rivers appeal from an entry of summary judgment by the Superior Court (York County, Fritz-sche, J.) in favor of Jerry Amato, the Estate of Phyllis Amato and Little A., Inc. (hereinafter Amato). The Rivers argue that they are entitled to a real estate commission pursuant to their exclusive listing agreement with Amato because they negotiated with and produced a buyer who was ready, willing, and able to purchase Amato’s property. In the alternative, the Rivers contend that they are entitled to a commission based on quantum meruit. Because the property was not sold,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Protection Insurance v. Acadia Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Doyle v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Labbe v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Smith v. CannellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moody v. State Liquor & Lottery CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Botka v. SC Noyes & Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- RICHARD A. MATHURIN AND ASSOCIATES, LLC v. CroweDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004