Legal Opinion

Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 22, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

This motion, brought by plaintiff under F.R.Civ.P. rule 37(a), 28 U.S.C.A., *82seeks to compel the defendant Ecker (one of eight defendants) to answer (as an individual defendant and as president of the defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) certain questions propounded to him in the course of an oral deposition being taken pursuant to F.R. C.P. rule 26. Exhibit “A” attached to the moving papers sets forth twenty-one questions and related context which are the subject-matter of the instant motion.

An examination of the record shows that, with respect to each of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Philco Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1957
  2. Elliott-McGowan Productions v. Republic Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Hall Bartlett Productions, Inc. v. Republic Pictures Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Besly-Welles Corp. v. Balax, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  2. Pillsbury Co. v. Alton Box Board Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  3. Lull v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API