Legal Opinion
Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Philco Distributors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 4, 1957No. Civ. No. 14083PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs are suing for treble damages under the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S. C.A. § 15, claiming that price fixing between defendants and other retailers forced them out of business.
Defendants are attempting to establish that the books of the plaintiffs do not fully reflect their business transactions. In the course of taking the depositions of William Blank, sole surviving officer of plaintiff corporations, pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., he was asked whether certain purported sales were reflected in the corporate books.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- RCA Mfg. Co. v. Decca Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Kingsway Press v. Farrell Pub. CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952
- Nakken Patents Corp. v. RabinowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- United States v. American Locomotive Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cymaticolor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- United States v. NYSCO Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Setzers Super Stores of Georgia, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965
- United States v. Beatrice Foods Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.