Legal Opinion

Lull v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 20, 2020No. 2:16-cv-01093Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUTOTEK, INC. and CHRISTOPHER No. 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD LULL, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Several motions are before the court. Plaintiffs Autotek, Inc. and Christopher Lull 19 (collectively “plaintiffs”) move for relief from the court’s prior order, Mot. for Relief, ECF No. 20 68-1, and move to amend their complaint, Mot. to Am., ECF No. 69-1. Defendants County of 21 Sacramento, Lori Moss Hunt, Leighann Moffitt, Brian Washko, Robin Rasmussen, Bob…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API