Town of Gilbert v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 Maricopa County, Donna Davis, Marci Sale, and Tony Hyland (collectively “Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s finding that House Bill 2145 (“HB 2145” or “the legislation”) is unconstitutional. They request that we reverse the trial court’s decision and declare the legislation constitutionally valid. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 The underlying facts of the ease are undisputed. Rural Metro is a private company that provides fire and emergency response services. It advised the county island 1 residents within the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of SurpriseArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Bennett v. NapolitanoArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State Compensation Fund v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gila River Indian Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Steve Gallardo v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BartschiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Gila River Indian Community v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.