State v. Yarborough
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
In this case, we must determine (1) if the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions of rioting and breaking or enter ing and (2) if a sufficient foundation was laid for the introduction of photographs showing extensive damage to the prosecuting witness’ house.
I
The evidence concerning the rioting and breaking or entering charges follows. On the evening of 6 June 1980, the prosecuting witness, Pamela Neal, was in her yard with her two children and two friends. The defendants came into Ms. Neal’s yard carrying sticks which were three feet long and two to four inches…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RobinetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BaskinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. WorthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Clayton v. Mini Data FormsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008