Alfred Phosphate Co. v. Duck River Phosphate Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM HICKMAN. Appeal in Error from the Circuit Court of Hickman County. — Sam Holding, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister
The object of this petition is to condemn certain property belonging to the defendant company in the exercise of the right of eminent domain claimed under the laws of Tennessee. Complainant is a mining and manufacturing corporation, organized under chapter 142, p. 232, Acts 1875, with the powers therein conferred. Among other powers granted, it is provided therein:
“The said corporation shall have the right, in pursuance of the general law authorizing the condemnation of private property for works of internal improvement as set forth in sections 1844 to 1867 inclusive, to condemn a right of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Varner v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Ryan v. Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Board of Health v. Van HoesenMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Waddell's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Paint Rock Flume & Transportation Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Barge v. SadlerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Anderson v. Smith-Powers Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Nashville v. Dad's Auto Accessories, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.