Legal Opinion

Guarantee Savings, Loan & Investment Co. v. Pendleton

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 9, 1899No. 64PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Hearing oh a petition by a defendant in a justice of the peace suit for a writ of certiorari to a justice of the Supreme Court of, the District, to which court the suit had been re.moved by appeal, and in which judgment had been entered against the petitioner, to have certified and returned to this court all the papers and pleadings in the cause. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Alvey

This is an application for the writ of certiorari, to be directed to one of the justices of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, requiring him to have certified and returned to this court all the papers and proceedings in a certain cause lately depending in that court, wherein Edmund Pendleton was plaintiff, and the Guarantee Savings, Loan and Investment Company was defendant — the said cause having been taken into the said Supreme Court by appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace on the prayer of the defendant, and there recently tried and decided by said Supreme Court in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Central Trust Co. v. McGeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Kronski v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Lawton v. HoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Totten v. HarloweCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API