Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sherman v. Pape

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1918No. 14892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court June 19, 1918, for a writ of mandate, to compel payment of funds into the state treasury.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This is an original application for mandate to compel the respondent to pay into the state treasury funds aggregating $6,987.63, assessed and *320charged by the respondent against private forest landowners for fire protection during the year 1917.

It is alleged that, pursuant to ch. 105, Laws of 1917, p. 349, § 2, during the year 1917, respondent contracted with divers persons for the patrolling and protection from fire of certain forest property subject to protection in the manner provided in the act, and thereafter received from the owners of such property, and from the treasurers of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Bell v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. State ex rel. Peel v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State ex rel. Johnson v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Dukesherer Farms, Inc v. Director of the Department of AgricultureMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Chambers v. McCollumIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Allen v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Robison v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API