Legal Opinion
Rahim v. Holden
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 22, 2011No. Civ. No. 10-551-SLRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mumin Rahim (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, filed this lawsuit alleging violations of his constitutional right to due process. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and was granted leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. (See D.I. 4) Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). (D.I. 23) The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons discussed, the court will grant the motion. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rahim v. HoldenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Aikens v. MeyerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Aikens v. NCCPD Chief Officer Colonel Vaughn M. Bond, Jr.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Aikens v. New Castle County Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Jones v. KirchenbauerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.