Legal Opinion
Rahim v. Holden
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 22, 2012No. Civ. No. 10-551-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mu’min Rahim (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (“VCC”), Smyrna, Delaware, filed this lawsuit alleging deprivation of his right to due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and was granted leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. (See D.I. 4) Presently before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs amended complaint. (D.I. 37) The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abbatiello v. MetzgerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Fatir v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
- Flores v. EmigDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Shaw v. MockDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- William J. Webb, Jr. v. Veronica TilghmanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2026