Legal Opinion
Hewitt v. Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 1980No. Civ. 18677PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAMRICK, J. *
The petitioners James O. Hewitt and other named individuals (Hewitt) are taxpaying landowners and water users within the Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water District (Rincon). Rincon is a public agency organized in 1954 under the provisions of the Municipal Water District Law of 1911, and originally included lands located outside the boundaries of the City of Escondido (City). Because of annexations to the City, certain lands now lie within both Rincon and the City. However, a major portion of Rincon’s territory still remains outside City’s boundaries. For many years, City…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holt Civic Club v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bagley v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Henshaw v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carlton Santee Corp. v. Padre Dam Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Cerini v. City of CloverdaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- American Isuzu Motors, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Leevin Taitano Camacho, Attorney General of Guam v. Dafne M. Shimizu, Director, Guam Department of Revenue and Taxation, Lourdes A. Leon Guerrero, Governor of Guam, Atlas Amusement Enterprises, Inc., Darryl R. Styles d/b/a D&D Games, Guam Music, Inc., and DOES 1-10Supreme Court of Guam · 2021
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1995