Legal Opinion

American Family Insurance v. Metropolitan Transit Commission

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1988No. C7-87-2240PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

American Family Insurance appeals a summary judgment awarded in favor of respondent Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), wherein the trial court found that the 1986 amendment to Minn.Stat. § 65B.47 of the Minnesota No-Fault Act applies to all claims made after the effective date of the amendment. We reverse.

FACTS

On January 28, 1986, Corrine Vincent tripped and fell while exiting an MTC bus, suffering personal injuries. At the time of her accident, and at all times relevant herein, Ms. Vincent was an insured with appellant American Family, for purposes of the Minnesota…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Galle v. Excalibur Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. AMCO Insurance Co. v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amer. Fam. Ins. v. Metro. Transit Com'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API